Article Archives
- April 2024
- February 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- All Current Articles
Article Categories
U.S. Department of Labor Unveils Joint Employer Rule Proposal
Four Factors Establish Joint Employer Control
On April 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, (DOL) announced a proposed rule that, if
finalized, would revise the standard for joint employer status under three federal wage and hour laws: the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA); the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA); and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker
Protection Act (MSPA). This structure mirrors the DOL’s plan for its independent contractor rule, as we previously
reported.
In sum, the DOL seeks to create a single nationwide standard for when two or more employers can be jointly liable for
workplace offenses under federal laws that protect wages, unpaid leave, and migrant and seasonal farm employees. This
rule, if enacted, will impact franchises, staffing agencies, gig workers, businesses that outsource their labor, and
employers in the health care and construction industries, among others.
The first Trump Administration’s DOL issued a rule that required one business to exert “actual” control over another
company’s workers to be jointly on the hook for wage, overtime and other labor violations. After a federal court largely
vacated the Trump 1.0 rule, the Biden Administration’s DOL rescinded that rule.
The current proposed rule takes a different approach from Trump 1.0, stating that a set of four factors should “weigh the
economic reality of the potential joint employer’s control, direct or indirect, over the employee.”
The four factors are whether a company:
1. Has the power to hire or fire a worker.
2. Supervises or controls a worker’s schedule or conditions of employment to a substantial degree.
3. Determines the rate and method of payment.
4. Maintains a worker’s employment records.
According to the proposal, additional factors may be relevant in assessing joint employment, but a unanimous finding on
the above four factors in either direction would establish a "substantial likelihood" regarding whether an individual or
entity is a joint employer with another business.
The rule is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on April 23, 2026. The DOL will accept public comments until
June 22, 2026. Employers affected by this rule should consider submitting comments during this 60-day period. If the
proposed rule is finalized, employers should reassess their work-sharing agreements, wage-and-hour policies and FMLA
leave procedures through the lens of the new standard, ensuring that all joint employer issues are properly addressed.
In the meantime, employers should recognize that the proposed rule does not affect the analysis for determining joint
employer status under other laws or standards, including state law. Employers should continue to follow all applicable
state and local laws to ensure they are in compliance with all relevant standards.
Additional Assistance
For further assistance, please contact any of the attorneys on our Labor and Employment Practice Team or the Phillips
Lytle attorney with whom you have a relationship.

